2022·Probably Europe (exact location undisclosed)

EUCOM area of responsibility (exact location undisclosed).Europe · the “erratic movement” in an altered video

A nearly four-minute clip circulates under the title “Spherical UAP Erratic movement [CALLSIGN] (Mission) 2022,” given by whoever uploaded it to a classified network in June 2024. The Pentagon office for these phenomena (AARO) warns that the video was digitally altered before upload and that those alterations “significantly influence” the object's apparent behavior during the first 45 seconds, without saying how it really moved. It is part of the 50-video batch found on that network at the request of eight House members (↗). It probably comes from a military sensor in Europe.

Tier B · IndicativeWhat do they mean? →

Limited evidence: a single witness, testimony gathered years later, or an account without contemporary primary documentation.

What it was

52%no known cause

The evidence is not enough to decide between the explanations

No known causeNatural or human cause
See the split across the six explanations

No known cause

Indeterminate45%
Non-human, hidden by a state5%
Non-human, controlled by no state2%

Natural or human cause

Likely ordinary, unidentified40%
Classified human technology6%
Adversary technology2%
If it was ordinary, why no specific cause is named: No source proposes what the area of contrast was. AARO ascribes the apparent behavior, not the identity, to digital edits that "significantly influence the area of contrast's apparent performance characteristics".
Read the full reasoningOn Metabunk, the thread's author writes "I was thinking about some drone, maybe" and later asks "Missile? Drone?", with nobody defending either reading; one participant finds it "just not giving enough information to make conclusive identification". The absence of a published analysis is not evidence against an ordinary cause: AARO's FY2024 report finalized "all 174 cases" as "resolved to prosaic objects including balloons, birds, UAS, satellites, and aircraft", though "many other cases remain unresolved".
(AARO — DOW-UAP-PR054 (DVIDS, PURSUE Release 02); Metabunk — thread “DOW-UAP-PR054, Spherical UAP Erratic movement” (Jul 2026) · AARO — Fiscal Year 2024 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP (14 Nov 2024), base rate ↗)

Record of the event

DOW-UAP-PR054 — uploader title 'Erratic movement'; AARO notes digital editing influenced the apparent performance (3:57)

Infrared video of 3:57, published on DVIDS on May 22, 2026 as DOW-UAP-PR054 (PURSUE's second release). A user uploaded it to the classified network in June 2024 under that title; AARO assesses as likely that it comes from an infrared sensor on a U.S. military platform in EUCOM's area in August 2022.

Read more

AARO's note says the video was digitally altered before upload and is presented as received: from 0:00 to 0:45 an area of contrast near the center, with alterations that significantly influence its apparent performance; from 0:46 to 3:57, after an apparent cut, an area that passes in and out of frame as the sensor tracks it.

Uploader anónimo (lote de la red clasificada), vía DVIDS (PURSUE Release 02) · Public domain · US Government work · open original

What happened

This three-minute-57-second clip, cataloged as DOW-UAP-PR054, is part of the 50-video batch AARO located on a classified network while responding to the request eight members of the House of Representatives filed on March 6, 2026 for access to 51 potentially UAP-related records.

The title "Spherical UAP Erratic movement [CALLSIGN] (Mission) 2022" was defined, according to AARO's assessment, by whoever uploaded the file to the classified network in June 2024; it is not a Department of War designation. AARO assesses as likely, without confirming, that the video derives from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform operating in European Command's (EUCOM) area of responsibility in August 2022.

AARO's official visual description states explicitly that "this media was digitally altered prior to its upload to a classified network, and is presented as received." Between seconds 0 and 45, it says, "the video features an area of contrast generally within the center of the frame. The sensor pans to track the area of contrast. Digital alterations to the video footage significantly influence the area of contrast's apparent performance characteristics."

AARO thus attributes to the editing a significant influence on the area of contrast's apparent behavior during those first 45 seconds, without saying how the object actually moved. Between seconds 46 and 3:57, after what AARO describes as an apparent cut, the video refocuses on an area of contrast that intermittently enters and exits the frame as the sensor tracks it.

DVIDS lists August 1, 2022 as the date taken and an undisclosed location. AARO specifies that its description is provided for informational purposes only and should not be read as an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion or factual determination about the validity, nature or significance of the event described. The material was uploaded to DVIDS on May 22, 2026, as part of PURSUE's second release, with no coordinates, platform identification or crew statement.

Why it matters

AARO's own text says the video was altered before reaching the classified network and that the alterations significantly influence the area of contrast's apparent behavior, so it is not known how much of the movement the title announces comes from the object. It is not known who edited it or why. There are two possibilities that no source raises: an attempt to improve visibility (stabilization, contrast enhancement), or an edit that introduced or exaggerated behavior the sensor never recorded. Without the unedited file, neither can be confirmed or ruled out.

In the Metabunk thread on the clip (July 12 to 15, 2026), one participant suggested someone had motion-tracked the object in software and zoomed in, and noted that the zoom removes the context of the movement; another concluded the video does not give enough information to identify it. A third proposed that the video might be a camera recording of a screen, which would add a second camera movement; the thread's author thought this unlikely given the object's motion blur, though he said he could not prove it. Mick West, after stabilizing it on the object, said it is very difficult to separate the object's own motion from the camera's (operator recentering and parallax) and that there does seem to be some object maneuvering, "but I'd not put money on it."

No source proposes what the area of contrast was. Metabunk raises a drone, a balloon or a missile, with nobody defending any of them. In its fiscal year 2024 report, AARO finalized 174 cases, all as conventional objects (balloons, birds, drones, satellites and aircraft), and added that many other cases remain unresolved: the figure is the rate among resolved cases, not among all cases.

Documents and sources

Documented evidence

  1. Title "Erratic movement" is a user label, not a Department of War designation, per AARO itself
  2. AARO states explicitly: "digital alterations to the video footage significantly influence the area of contrast's apparent performance characteristics"
  3. The file was edited before being uploaded to the classified network, according to AARO; it is not known who edited it
  4. An "apparent cut" splits the video into two segments (0:00-0:45 and 0:46-3:57)
  5. AARO warns that "many of these materials" in the batch lack a substantiated chain of custody, without saying which
Show 2 more facts
  1. AARO only "assesses" as likely (without confirming) a EUCOM origin, August 2022
  2. Released in PURSUE Release 02 (uploaded to DVIDS May 22, 2026), public domain

Related cases