Estados UnidosUnited States.PURSUE · sistema presidencial de release UAPPURSUE · Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters

On May 8, 2026, President Donald Trump's administration formally activated the PURSUE system — Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters — through an executive directive to the newly renamed Department of War (the Department of Defense was officially renamed 'Department of War' in 2026). The mandate is an interagency effort to locate, review, identify, declassify and publish unresolved UAP records in the federal government's possession.

The system's public infrastructure lives at the official URL war.gov/ufo/, and publishes in tranches. Release 1 opened on May 8, 2026; Release 2 followed on May 22; and Release 3 was published on June 12, 2026. It is an interagency effort including the White House, ODNI, the Department of Energy, the Department of War's AARO, NASA, the FBI and additional components of the intelligence community. By mid-June 2026, the portal had surpassed 1.7 billion global accesses — an unprecedented figure for a classified-archive release. The records include military videos, photos, pilot reports and administrative review documents that had been internally categorized as UAP in previous decades and had never been published.

The third release (June 12) is the most substantive in content: 53 documents, 10 digital renderings, six videos —some of orb-like objects, with 'artistic interpretations' of incidents reported by a federal agent— and three NASA audio recordings, among them a debrief by astronaut Gordon Cooper discussed with journalist Walter Cronkite in a 1962 interview. Among the documents is a previously classified CIA record of the sighting of an unidentified object over Harare International Airport (Zimbabwe) by both radar and optical means, hovering at an undetermined altitude with 'beams' emanating from it at one point. None of the pieces, however, constitutes the conclusive material evidence the underlying question would require.

The assessment report accompanying the third release —signed on June 5, 2026 by Dr. Jon Kosloski, director of AARO— is what drew the attention, to the point that astrophysicist Avi Loeb called it 'the most intriguing release thus far'. It characterizes much of the material as luminous 'plasma-like' orbs and describes unresolved cases of structured behavior: among them an orange 'mother orb' releasing smaller red orbs, and an October 2024 iPhone video of a plasma-like sphere hovering over a pond at ~2,700 feet that changes shape and luminosity, separates into points of light, stays stationary for about 45 minutes and disappears. Kosloski concedes that roughly 40% of reported phenomena lack a reasonable explanation, while most resolved cases reduce to balloons, drones, birds or sensor artifacts, with no evidence of extraterrestrial technology or an adversary breakthrough. Analytically the 'plasma-like' framing is ambivalent: it pushes the material toward the natural-phenomena bucket (atmospheric plasma, the Hessdalen family), but the residue of structured behavior —a 'mother orb' emitting sub-orbs— is precisely what natural plasma does not do (it floats, glows, expands; it does not maneuver or subdivide with intent), so that 40% sits in the undecidable zone between classified technology and non-human entities, without discriminating between them. That undecidability became explicit days later: at the June 9 Capitol press conference ↗, David Grusch framed plasmoids not as natural plasma but as 'sentient plasmoid life', placing them among non-human entities. The same plasma orb is thus read by AARO (June 5) as a natural phenomenon and by Grusch (June 9) as an entity — the plasmoid is the object contested between the two hypotheses, with no presented piece resolving it.

The institutional reading of the system is ambiguous by design. On the one hand, it is the first U.S. federal UAP-release architecture with a direct presidential mandate and a stable public URL — a qualitative change from prior discretionary releases (Project Blue Book closure, FOIA, post-2022 AARO). On the other, it includes no obligation to disclose new material evidence nor to release the specific files David Grusch identified by name to congressional oversight in 2023. The directive is procedural —channel enabled— not probative —content guaranteed—. Institutional critics and the Mellon/Loeb circle characterize PURSUE as 'managed transparency': narrative control of flow, not openness.

Es el primer cambio de **infraestructura institucional** del ciclo UAP post-2017. AAWSAP, AATIP y AARO eran oficinas internas; el press conference del 9 de junio era presión; el UAP Disclosure Act es legislación pendiente. PURSUE es la primera pieza que materializa un canal federal de release con URL pública, mandato presidencial directo, cadencia de tandas (Releases 1–3 entre mayo y junio 2026) y volumen de uso medible (>1.700 M accesos). Su importancia es procedural —no resuelve la pregunta probatoria— pero reestructura el problema: el encubrimiento ya no puede sostenerse como 'no hay canal'. La pregunta operativa abierta ahora es '¿qué pasa por el canal?' — y esa pregunta es accionable por presión política (Disclosure Act, audiencias congresionales) en una forma que no lo era antes. Tier A por la calidad institucional del aparato (directiva presidencial firmada, agencia federal con mandato, URL estable, volumen verificable), no por la fuerza evidencial del contenido — tras tres tandas (hasta el Release 3 del 12 jun 2026) el material es más rico (videos de orbes, audios históricos, un documento CIA sobre Harare por radar y óptica) pero ninguna pieza es concluyente ni mueve las narrativas de fondo del corpus sobre la naturaleza del fenómeno.

It is the first **institutional infrastructure** change of the post-2017 UAP cycle. AAWSAP, AATIP and AARO were internal offices; the June 9 press conference was pressure; the UAP Disclosure Act is pending legislation. PURSUE is the first piece that materializes a federal release channel with a public URL, direct presidential mandate, a tranche cadence (Releases 1–3 between May and June 2026) and measurable usage volume (>1.7B accesses). Its importance is procedural —it does not resolve the probative question— but it restructures the problem: the cover-up can no longer be sustained as 'there is no channel'. The operative question now open is 'what passes through the channel?' — and that question is actionable by political pressure (Disclosure Act, congressional hearings) in a way it was not before. Tier A for the institutional quality of the apparatus (signed presidential directive, federal agency with mandate, stable URL, verifiable volume), not for the evidential strength of the content — after three tranches (through Release 3 on June 12, 2026) the material is richer (orb videos, historical audio, a CIA document on Harare by radar and optical means) but no piece is conclusive nor moves the corpus's underlying narratives about the nature of the phenomenon.