Estados UnidosUnited States.Conferencia del Capitolio · Grusch + legisladores (9 jun 2026)Capitol Press Conference · Grusch + lawmakers (Jun 9, 2026)

On June 9, 2026, at 1:00 PM ET, a bipartisan gathering convened on the steps of the U.S. Capitol for a press conference coordinated by journalist Leslie Kean (author of the New York Times December 16, 2017 investigation that revealed AATIP) and documentary filmmaker James Fox. The main speakers were Representatives Eric Burlison (R-MO), Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) and Tim Burchett (R-TN), joined by whistleblower David Grusch — former Air Force intelligence officer and former representative to the Pentagon's UAP Task Force. Grusch had previously testified under oath before Congress in July 2023 about classified programs for the recovery and reverse-engineering of craft of non-human origin.

The conference formalized three concrete demands. First: presidential declassification of specific UAP files that Grusch has named to intelligence oversight bodies. Second: congressional passage of the UAP Disclosure Act, with systematic release pathways and national-security protections. Third: strengthened whistleblower protections preventing administrative retaliation, plus international coordination inviting allied governments to contribute UAP evidence. Lawmakers specifically cited the 1996 Varginha incident among the records to be declassified, and raised the possibility that the beings reported there were transported to the United States as part of recovery programs.

Grusch escalated his public language relative to the 2023 testimony: he stated that the U.S. government is "aware of 'several' kinds" of non-human intelligences, "ranging in complexity". Asked about those species, he described them as "a continuum from corporeal bipedal life to what I would consider sentient plasmoid life" — the first time a formal whistleblower explicitly places plasmoids within the catalogue of non-human intelligences. The claim is analytically relevant because it collides head-on with the framing AARO itself had given the plasma-like material of PURSUE's third release ↗: where Kosloski (June 5 report) reads 'plasma' as a semi-mundane natural phenomenon, Grusch (June 9) reads 'sentient plasmoid life' as an entity. The same object —the plasma orb— is thus contested between the mundane/natural narrative and the non-human-entities one. The caveat is mandatory: established science does not recognize plasma-based life and there is no verified evidence of conscious plasmoids; the term may reflect something Grusch was told or an internal usage from classified discussions, not a documented fact. The event is framed by President Trump's declassification directive issued in May 2026 and by the PURSUE portal opened as a release channel, which by June had accumulated more than one billion accesses to first batches of pilot reports, videos and historical files. The press conference did not present new documents — its value is procedural and political: translating sustained pressure into formally actionable requests.

The conference works as the public front of a legislative operation already running through formal channels. Days earlier (May 27, 2026), Burlison had sent MITRE Corporation legislative interrogatories and production requests seeking UAP records since 1930 — including recovered materials, technologies of unknown origin and legacy 'crash-retrieval' and 'reverse-engineering' programs — under the legal framework of the UAP Records Collection established by the FY 2024 NDAA ↗. An analogous letter had previously gone to MIT Lincoln Laboratory about the 1952 Beacon Hill Study. Grusch reinforced the historical weight of the line by explicitly citing the Turner Report (1971) — memorandum by the head of the Nuclear Branch at Australia's Joint Intelligence Organisation, allied equivalent of the DIA, which documented with candor the U.S. cover-up — recommending pages 7 through 16 (case 149, Australian National Archives A13693). The conference, the FFRDC letters and the cited allied archive thus read as three layers of the same operation: public pressure + formal subpoena + external historical corroboration.

Es la jugada de presión institucional más estructurada en EE.UU. desde el testimonio bajo juramento de Grusch en julio 2023, y se distingue por tres rasgos que pocas conferencias UAP previas exhiben juntos: composición bipartidista (republicanos y demócratas en la misma fila), demandas escritas accionables (no genéricas) y arquitectura procedural (directiva presidencial + ley del Congreso + protección a denunciantes + coordinación internacional). No aporta evidencia material nueva — su importancia es procedural, no probatoria. Por eso entra al corpus como pieza de presión institucional (categoría document), no como observación UAP. Su Tier A no califica fuerza evidencial sobre la naturaleza del fenómeno, sino calidad institucional de la presión: cuatro legisladores en ejercicio, un denunciante con testimonio bajo juramento previo, anfitriones con trayectoria periodística verificada, y un encaje cronológico con la directiva ejecutiva de mayo 2026. Alrededor de esta presión se ha consolidado un ecosistema de disclosure más amplio: figuras de advocacy como el contralmirante (r) Tim Gallaudet y el abogado constitucional Daniel Sheehan, productos culturales como el documental 'The Age of Disclosure' de Dan Farah (2025), y nuevos denunciantes como Jake Barber, que en 2025 afirmó haber participado en recuperaciones de objetos no identificados.

It is the most structured institutional-pressure move in the U.S. since Grusch's sworn testimony in July 2023, and it is distinguished by three traits that few prior UAP conferences exhibit together: bipartisan composition (Republicans and Democrats on the same line), written, actionable demands (not generic ones) and a procedural architecture (presidential directive + congressional act + whistleblower law + international coordination). It does not bring new material evidence — its importance is procedural, not probative. That is why it enters the corpus as an institutional-pressure piece (category document), not as a UAP observation. Its Tier A does not score evidential strength about the nature of the phenomenon, but the institutional quality of the pressure: four sitting lawmakers, a whistleblower with prior sworn testimony, hosts with verified journalistic track record, and a chronological fit with the May 2026 executive directive. Around this pressure a broader disclosure ecosystem has consolidated: advocacy figures such as retired Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet and constitutional attorney Daniel Sheehan, cultural products such as Dan Farah's documentary 'The Age of Disclosure' (2025), and new whistleblowers such as Jake Barber, who in 2025 claimed to have taken part in recoveries of unidentified objects.