Case No. 320·United States

2019·Restricted warning area off San Diego, California

United States.USS Russell — 'pyramid' video (night vision)

In July 2019, off San Diego, the destroyer USS Russell (DDG-59) recorded an ~18 s night-vision clip showing several triangular or 'pyramid'-shaped objects flashing among the clouds. Released in 2021 by Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp from an ONI/UAPTF briefing, the Pentagon (Susan Gough, Apr 2021) confirmed it was captured by Navy personnel. Unlike the USS Omaha sphere from the same wave, the pyramid shape has a strong conventional explanation: bokeh —an artifact of the camera's aperture on out-of-focus point lights (drones/aircraft)—, with the Navy 'reasonably confident' they correlate with unmanned systems.

Year

2019

Tier

B

Probability

28%

Category

Incident

Limited evidence: single-witness, local or without primary verification. Three independent axes: the «tier» measures the strength of the evidence; the «probability» estimates how genuinely unexplained the case is —a natural phenomenon can remain unexplained, so it does not equal «non-prosaic»—; and the partition of explanations (below) says what it most plausibly was. So a well-documented case can have a possible hoax as its most plausible cause, and a Tier B is not, for that reason, a hoax.

Primary documents · viewer

Video shown by Scott Bray to Congress (May 17, 2022): objects harassing Navy ships, later reclassified as unmanned systems

US Navy, exhibido en audiencia pública del Congreso, vía DVIDS · Dominio público · US Government work · open original

Contexto · el USS Russell (DDG-59), buque del vídeo de la 'pirámide' de 2019

Context · USS Russell (DDG-59), ship of the 2019 'pyramid' video

US Navy 030901-N-4033C-023 Guided missile destroyer USS Russell (DDG 59) passes Hospital Point, Hawaii, after returning from a routine four-month deployment to the Western Pacific Ocean.jpg · Wikimedia Commons · Dominio público · open original

Part 01

The night in question

In July 2019, in the same restricted warning area off the coast of San Diego (California) where the USS Omaha was operating, the guided-missile destroyer USS Russell (DDG-59) recorded with a night-vision camera a short clip —about 18 seconds— showing several triangular or 'pyramid'-shaped objects flashing and moving slowly among the night clouds. In the released material, one of the objects appears to hover over the ship's stern. The footage is part of the same wave of incursions that in those days affected a formation of several U.S. Navy destroyers (Omaha, Russell, Kidd, Rafael Peralta, John Finn, among others), an episode the Navy itself treated as a genuine concern: unidentified objects maneuvering in coordinated fashion over warships in an exercise area.

The material came to light in 2021, released by filmmaker Jeremy Corbell alongside investigative journalist George Knapp, who stated that the photos and videos came from an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) and UAP Task Force (UAPTF) briefing dated May 2020. In April 2021, Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough publicly confirmed that 'the referenced photos and videos were taken by Navy personnel' and that they fell within the task force's scope of analysis. As with the rest of the batch, the official confirmation covered the footage's provenance and authenticity —that the Navy did record it— not an explanation of its content.

Unlike the USS Omaha 'transmedium' sphere, the Russell 'pyramid' clip has a strong and widely accepted conventional explanation. Skeptical analyst Mick West showed that the triangular shape is an optical defocus artifact (bokeh): an out-of-focus point light source —an aircraft, a star or a drone— takes on the shape of the camera's aperture, and many photographic lenses have bladed apertures that produce triangular or polygonal bokeh. The flashing fits aircraft navigation lights and the slow drift fits distant objects. The Navy itself, according to later reports, was 'reasonably confident' the triangles correlated with unmanned aerial systems (drones) present in the area, with the triangular appearance explained by light passing through night-vision goggles and then being recorded with an SLR camera.

On May 17, 2022, Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence Scott Bray showed this same video before the House Intelligence Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation Subcommittee, at Congress's first public UAP hearing in over 50 years. Per the official description accompanying the footage's later public release, the objects —there described as 'multiple objects... harassing Navy ships participating in Naval Exercises off Southern California'— were 'subsequently reclassified as unmanned aerial systems' based on additional information from other sightings. That is more categorical language than the earlier formulation ('reasonably confident'): the version shown to Congress presents the reclassification as an accomplished fact, not a likely hypothesis.

Part 02

Why this case moved the needle

The USS Russell case matters less for what it shows than for what it teaches about reading UAP evidence. It belongs to the same institutional chain of custody as the strongest 2019 clips —it was recorded by Navy personnel, confirmed by the Pentagon and examined by the UAPTF— and yet its anomaly dissolves under technical scrutiny. That combination makes it valuable as a calibration case: it shows that 'authenticated by the Pentagon' means 'the Navy recorded it', not 'it is inexplicable', and that within a single official batch data of very different strength coexist. Treating the whole package as equally mysterious —a frequent error in sensationalist coverage— is precisely what this case corrects.

That is why it lives in Tier B and with a low probability: the bokeh-plus-drones explanation is sober, reproducible and sufficient for the pyramid shape. What does remain as a serious residue is not the 'triangular' phenomenon but its context: in July 2019 there were real, coordinated incursions of objects —very probably drones— over U.S. warships, a fact the Navy documented in its bridge logs and which constitutes a genuine security and counterintelligence problem, with or without ontological mystery. The Russell case's value is twofold: it trims the exaggeration about the pyramid shape and, in doing so, sharpens the uncomfortable fact that does resist —that it is still not publicly established who was operating those drones or to what end. It is an example of the site's standard applied in the least glamorous direction: lowering the probability when the evidence demands it, and separating the hard datum (incursions over the fleet) from the camera artifact layered on top of it.

Part 03

What's left on paper

Documented evidence

  1. ~18 s night-vision clip from the USS Russell (DDG-59) showing triangular/pyramid-shaped objects, July 2019, off San Diego
  2. Part of the July 2019 multi-ship wave (Omaha, Russell, Kidd, Rafael Peralta, John Finn) documented by the Navy
  3. Source of the material: ONI/UAPTF briefing (May 2020) per Corbell and Knapp; released in 2021
  4. Pentagon confirmation (Susan Gough, Apr 2021): footage captured by Navy personnel, within the task force's analysis
  5. Bokeh analysis (Mick West): the triangular shape is a camera-aperture artifact on an out-of-focus point light source
  6. Later Navy assessment: 'reasonably confident' the triangles correlate with unmanned aerial systems (drones)

Sources

  1. DVIDS — video exhibido por Scott Bray ante el Congreso (17 may 2022), con nota de reclasificación como UAS Video embedded in this case's viewer.
  2. Wikipedia — 'Pentagon UFO videos' (confirmación de autenticidad, abril 2021)
  3. Global News — 'Leaked footage of pyramid-shaped UFOs is real, Pentagon says' (abr 2021)
  4. Metabunk / Mick West — análisis de bokeh del video 'pirámide' del USS Russell Explanation of the triangular shape as an optical artifact of the camera diaphragm; a detail verifiable in the Metabunk thread.

Location

Restricted warning area off San Diego, California · 32.70°, -117.40°

Distribution of explanations

This case is classified among the model's hypotheses: the bar splits 100% by how much each explanation weighs (the uncertainty is spread across the hypotheses the case supports). Summed across the corpus they produce the comparable partition. It is a different question from the Probability above: that one estimates how likely the case is a genuinely unexplained phenomenon; this one splits which the explanation would be.

Misidentification53%
Adversary technology21%
Classified human technology18%
Non-human + state cover-up5%
Non-human, no state management3%

Modal hypothesis: Misidentification 53% · sums to 100%

Confused with: Aircraft

Structured analytical judgment, not a calibrated frequency. Forced classification: the mass the evidence cannot assign is spread across the hypotheses the case does support.

Referenced by 1 case

Related cases